DSpace
Universidad de Navarra

Dadun >
Depósito Académico >
Clínica Universidad de Navarra >
Neurología >
DA - CUN - Neurología - Artículos de revista >

Statistics
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10171/22688

Title: Tratamiento médico de la estenosis arterial intracraneal. ¿Es el mismo en prevención primaria que en secundaria?
Other Titles: Medical treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis. Are primary and secondary prevention the same thing?
Author(s) : Irimia, P. (Pablo)
Riverol, M. (M.)
Martinez-Vila, E. (Eduardo)
Issue Date: 2002
Publisher: Viguera
Citation: Irimia-Sieira P, Riverol-Fernandez M, Martinez-Vila E. Tratamiento médico de la estenosis arterial intracraneal. ¿Es el mismo en prevención primaria que en secundaria? Rev Neurol 2003 Oct 1-15;37(7):644-648.
Keywords: Arteriosclerosis/complications/drug therapy/pathology
Brain Ischemia/drug therapy/etiology/pathology/prevention & control
Constriction, Pathologic/drug therapy/pathology/prevention & control
Abstract: In this study we review the risk factors associated with the formation and progression of an atheroma plaque, the mechanism involved in cerebral ischemia secondary to intracranial atheromatosis and possible medical treatment in primary and secondary prevention. DEVELOPMENT: Medical treatment of intracranial stenoses (ICS) is aimed at stopping the progression of the atheroma plaque and at preventing recurrences in the case of symptomatic stenoses. It is based on the control of vascular risk factors, the use of statins and antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs). Although antiplatelet agents have not proved to be beneficial in the primary prevention of stroke, they are recommended in patients with ICS in order to lower the risk of heart attack associated with this pathology. The use of antiplatelet drugs in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke secondary to an ICS is based on clinical trials which have shown that antiaggregation prevents non-cardioembolic strokes. Nevertheless, several retrospective studies have observed that oral anticoagulation is better than antiaggregation with aspirin. Two prospective clinical trials are currently being conducted which will, in the next few years, help to determine what the first choice medical treatment is for this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Medical treatment of ICS patients must include the control of vascular risk factors and the use of statins. New studies are needed to be able to establish the first choice antithrombotic drug in secondary prevention.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10171/22688
Publisher version (URL): http://www.neurologia.com/pdf/Web/3707/p070644.pdf
Appears in Collections:DA - CUN - Neurología - Artículos de revista

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Rev Neurol 2003.644.pdf107,01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Statistics

Import into RefWorks

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback