Dadun Dadun cabecera universidad cabecera biblioteca
   (New user)
Help  | Contact  |  Castellano English  
 

Dadun > Revistas y series UN > Anuario Filosófico > 2000-2009 > REV - AF - 2001, vol. 34, n. 1 >

Dos melioristas: ¿Decisionismo metodológico o ética de las creencias?
Authors: Ortiz-de-Landázuri, C. (Carlos)
Issue Date: 2001
ISSN: 0066-5215
Citation: Anuario Filosófico, 2001 (34), 75-100
Abstract
The fallibilism of Peirce and Popper admits a process of im-provement, without skepticism or relativism, as the radical post-modernism of some of their followers suggests. However Karl-Otto Apel across their intellectual life have shown that meliorism is very different in both authors: Popper justifies his position by a methodological decisionism, whereas Peirce justifies his approach by a transcendental pragmatic foundation, which is the only valid according to Apel.
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10171/763
Appears in Collections:REV - AF - 2001, vol. 34, n. 1

Files in This Item:
File:  4. DOS MELIORISTAS DECISIONISMO METODOLÓGICO O ÉTICA DE LAS CREENCIAS (A TRAVÉS DE KARL OTTO APEL), CARLOS ORTIZ DE LANDÁZURI.pdf
Description: 
Size:  2,96 MB
Format:  Adobe PDF
 View / Open 

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.