Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGalina, V. (Vdóvina)-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-18T18:55:13Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-18T18:55:13Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationGalina, V. (2017). After Suárez: Physical and Intentional Causality in the 17th–18th Centuries Scholasticism. Scientia et Fides, Vol. 5, Nº 1, pp. 241-265es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2353-5636-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/43320-
dc.description.abstractThe article investigates the distinction between the physical and the intentional causality that appeared in the 17th century scholasticism in the course of polemics with the traditional Aristotelian classification of causes and with the conception of causality developed by Francisco Suárez. The introduction of the distinction between physical and intentional causation was motivated by the insufficiency of the notion of causality, adopted in ancient and medieval natural philosophy to describe the causal processes in the sphere of conscious human activity. The authors of the 17th century took as a base two concepts carefully elaborated by Suárez, that is, the concepts of influxus and of metaphorica motio, and, starting from them, introduced an additional concept of influxus intentionalis.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherServicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarraes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectphysical/intentional casualityes_ES
dc.subject17th centrury scholasticismes_ES
dc.subjectFrancisco Suárezes_ES
dc.subjectinfluxus intentionalises_ES
dc.titleAfter Suárez: Physical and Intentional Causality in the 17th–18th Centuries Scholasticismes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
10.pdf
Description
Size
362.32 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.