Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorArregi, B. (Beñat)-
dc.creatorGaray-Martinez, R. (Roberto)-
dc.creatorRamos-González, J. (Juan Carlos)-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-17T08:24:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-17T08:24:06Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-
dc.identifier.citationArregi, B., Garay-Martinez, R., & Ramos, J. C. (2023). Estimation of thermal resistance and capacitance of a concrete wall from in situ measurements: A comparison of steady-state and dynamic models. Energy and Buildings, 296, 113393.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/69355-
dc.description.abstractThere is a growing interest in characterising the thermal performance of building envelopes when exposed to realistic weather and indoor conditions. In this study, data from a full-scale test of four uninsulated concrete panels is analysed using (1) a steady-state model as per the standard average method, (2) a dynamic lumped resistance-capacitance model with a stochastic method, and (3) a dynamic distributed capacitance model based on an analytical solution. These have been favoured over purely data-driven methods, since their physical formulation allows the characterisation of thermal capacity alongside the usual thermal resistance. The models are applied to different data subsets, sampling times and campaign lengths. For the sole estimation of thermal resistance, winter conditions with constant indoor heating allow campaign lengths around 72 h. For a strong indoor-outdoor temperature difference (e.g. 10 degrees C) steady-state models provide reliable estimates, and lumped capacitance models are found to suit lower temperature differences or less stable conditions. However, for estimating thermal capacity, fluctuating indoor and outdoor temperatures are preferred and only the distributed capacitance model provides consistent estimates for different time steps and data subsets. The present work might be helpful in establishing future guidelines for the use of dynamic methods with physical interpretation, presenting a case study of a simple well-known wall facing a variety of winter and summer conditions. It might also provide a basis for further research, extending the application of these models to more complex multi-layer walls and/or for the assessment of design scenarios including thermal insulation.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe experimental campaign featured in this study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement ID 637138. This paper ref lects only the authors’ views and neither the Agency nor the Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.-
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectBuilding envelope.es_ES
dc.subjectIn situ measurements.es_ES
dc.subjectHeat flow meter method.es_ES
dc.subjectThermal resistance.es_ES
dc.subjectThermal capacitancees_ES
dc.titleEstimation of thermal resistance and capacitance of a concrete wall from in situ measurements: A comparison of steady-state and dynamic modelses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.editorial.noteThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113393-

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
1-s2.0-S0378778823006230-main.pdf
Description
Size
8.62 MB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.